matt w wrote:
Yeah, in my opinion and only my opinion, I don't want to hector any individual creator if their muse tells them only to create male characters. I'm not sure that the collected stories of J.G. Ballard have a single female viewpoint character,* and though his treatment of women is certainly a limitation, I like his work. But I think it's a good idea to try to find out whether you really are that limited.
Well, for me, this topic was more about, how do you create a character? Or how do you create something that will be not-predicted?
Obviously I don't need a permission slip, but I don't want to be totally clueless about things. And to me, woman vs man is the most obvious and evident change to make to try something new. Having something like an Orc as a character isn't really a meaningful try to me, because orcs have their own stereotypes/conventions and almost functional specifications, and if you mess that up, people can laugh a bit. Nationalities and sexes don't have that.
I suppose it's not just about making the choice and having a reason to but also having people to bounce it off so the ridiculous bits get plowed over. I mean, it probably seems duh-obvious to say this, but I'd like to see people take risks and position themselves to and it's interesting to see why/how some people did this.
I remember some creative writing exercises where the class was asked to do this sort of thing and I felt I couldn't do so on demand & it felt pretty hampering. So I was thinking back to some of that while reading this topic, and it's good to see ways around it or different ways to think of it rather than "I'd better stick to X, because it was no fun to try anything different."
Also, my character is no longer referred to as 'son' in my latest revision.