intfiction.org

The Interactive Fiction Community Forum
It is currently Wed Jun 20, 2018 2:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:51 pm
Posts: 796
Location: Geneva, Illinois, USA
He mentioned Netscape as evidence (that's 20 years ago now). Show me something bad business-wise in the last five, even ten years. Even the Windows Telemetry thing was addressed (https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-1 ... etry-data/) and was blown way out of proportion.

I believe Microsoft has changed and has open source developers best interests at "heart". I would wager in five years from today, that statement will still ring true.

I went to a Microsoft event in the early days of the Mono Project. Ballmer was on stage doing Q&A and I asked him what he thought of Mono. His face turned redder (it's always red I think) and he clearly disliked the concept of open source software. But he complimented Miguel and made an attempt to be gracious (failing, but not badly). It was clear that from a leadership perspective, Ballmer (and probably Gates behind the scenes) didn't understand the benefits of OSS. But Scott Hanselman, Scott Guthrie, and Satya Nadella have changed the culture of Microsoft. Their flagship development platform .NET now has a completely open source and cross platform implementation that's lauded by those using it. They started ripping apart IIS and rebuilding web server technology as opens source components. (of course web servers are about to become extinct with static web hosting and serverless API's now en vogue). There's an open source beta project to compile dotnet core in WebAssembly so you can run C#/ASP.NET in the browser. That's not a company trying to lock people in to anything. That's a company just building cool tools.

My read here is that you and many others were burned by Microsoft in the past (and in many cases, the very distant past, like A Long Time Ago, in a Galaxy Far Far Away distant past) and you can't find a way to look at the current 2018 industry with an open mind. If there's anything about computers that's true is that everything changes very quickly and if you want to stay in business, you really can't keep pissing people off. The Nokia purchase is an excellent example. I think Ballmer had good intentions, but their legacy of abuse tainted Windows Phone and well, Apple+iOS was the sexy new thing. That was the lesson they needed to learn. They tried to make Windows Phone work for several years. They simply could not get any serious developers to care. They couldn't even _pay_ developers to care.

The second they realized they'd lost the developers, they knew they'd screwed the pooch and had to make wholesale changes to even survive. Luckily for them, Windows and Office are still fundamental business tools that allowed them to muddle through the transition to cloud and open source.

But that's it. They did make that transition. They have the largest footprint of open source software of any organization in the world and although they have work to do, they are making an honest effort to win back the developers.

_________________
David C.
https://github.com/ChicagoDave

"It boots nothing to avoid his snares, for they are ever beset by other snares." - The shade of High Lord Mhoram, The Wounded Land - Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:34 am
Posts: 104
Location: Kemerovo
It is an understandable desire not to put all your work and pet projects in the hands of an international corporation that may have some access to your work contact book from LinkedIn and Skype. Because international corporations are never "good" or "bad", they are big and they do big business. It does not matter if Microsoft is good now, because they can turn all sorts of bad in the future.

Personally, I don't use Gitlab much, although I did squat the "ifiction" group. Gitlab.com is slow and prone to failures; tried hosting my own omnibus - too expensive. So until they finish ActivityPub federation, I'm using small Gitea forges on the Internet like Notabug or Heropunch.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 11:32 pm
Posts: 298
I too used to hold a grudge against Microsoft for their actions in the XP era and earlier. But the Microsoft that bought GitHub isn't the one that wrote the Halloween papers, it's the one that's been relying on GitHub to host 1800+ of Microsoft's own open-source projects, including their entire web/server development stack (.NET Core, ASP.NET Core, Roslyn, MSBuild, Visual Studio Code, TypeScript, even PowerShell).

As for that TechRights site, it's enlightening to go back and read their archives about, say, Mono and see how many of their predictions have come true.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:56 am
Posts: 80
I don't want to be near Microsoft. That's a fact.
Examples of «great work» are their office suite, skype breakdown, own QRcode failure, OS defects attribuited to user, 'to fix this error by new version' actitude. For years without them, the best ever. I'm moving to gitlab as well.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 9:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 5:48 am
Posts: 49
well, I'm a Linux stormtrooper :D and I don't care much about m$ aside recon & intel, and the current state of the OS/closed-sorce disagreement can be termed "cold war".

In the specific, I distrust cloud computing and cautiously trust backup external HD. My ../if directory incl what really matters, ../if/wrk, is weekly mirrored in every HD, online and offline.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 2:48 pm
Posts: 988
Location: Greece
Unpopular opinion: GitHub will be fine, nothing will change, no reason to migrate. But if something does change, and it's really bad, I can migrate then.

_________________
@realnc


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:03 pm
Posts: 518
Location: Washington
RealNC wrote:
Unpopular opinion: GitHub will be fine, nothing will change, no reason to migrate. But if something does change, and it's really bad, I can migrate then.

Have you witnessed the chaos MS caused with their "GVFS" and flippancy over namespace collisions?

_________________
David Griffith


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 11:32 pm
Posts: 298
DavidG wrote:
RealNC wrote:
Unpopular opinion: GitHub will be fine, nothing will change, no reason to migrate. But if something does change, and it's really bad, I can migrate then.

Have you witnessed the chaos MS caused with their "GVFS" and flippancy over namespace collisions?

Kudos to Microsoft for tackling the issues plaguing large Git repos that the Git community was unwilling to tackle, I guess. Facebook and Google ended up just choosing Mercurial instead.

What exactly was the problem? That they called it Git Virtual File System (GVFS) when there was already the GNOME Virtual File System (GVfs) -- not to be confused with GnomeVFS (!) or the Linux Virtual File System? If so, you're in luck, they're soliciting new names.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 4:56 pm
Posts: 5676
Quote:
Have you witnessed the chaos MS caused with their "GVFS" and flippancy over namespace collisions?


Nope.

Now that I look, still don't see much chaos. A couple of annoyed reddit threads, yes. Anyhow that was a decision they made over a year ago, so why does it make you think RealNC is wrong?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:03 pm
Posts: 518
Location: Washington
zarf wrote:
Quote:
Have you witnessed the chaos MS caused with their "GVFS" and flippancy over namespace collisions?


Nope.

Now that I look, still don't see much chaos. A couple of annoyed reddit threads, yes. Anyhow that was a decision they made over a year ago, so why does it make you think RealNC is wrong?


Stomping on namespace is bad enough taken in isolation. Usually that can be explained by a momentary lapse of judgment. When Microsoft does it, it's yet another example of placing no importance upon ideals of writing and implementing programs with an eye to security and stability.

Here's another example of why you don't want Microsoft getting involved in Open Source projects: https://www.preining.info/blog/2018/06/ ... packaging/
That one came out on Friday and the problems discovered yesterday. There is no reason why Microsoft couldn't have gotten this right unless they just don't care to do it right.

_________________
David Griffith


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group